MARCH PARTNERSBook a Call
Services / Franchise & Multi-site

Franchise. Multi-site. Growth Strategy.

Specialist advisory for three types of Australian business owner. Franchisors running an established system. Operators running multi-site businesses. And owners asking whether their business can grow beyond one site to multiple sites, and potentially into a national footprint. Grounded in the financial model that turns growth ambition into a real plan.

How we help

Whether you run many, or you're deciding whether you can.

Multi-site and franchise operations sit inside a small set of accounting and strategic patterns that most generalist firms don't see often enough to get right. We do. Consolidated group reporting, site-level P&L, marketing fund trust accounting, royalty reconciliation, franchisor valuation. And on the front end, the strategic work of choosing the right structure before you scale.

Group 01

Multi-site operators

You run 3, 10, 50 sites. Whether it's a franchise system, corporate-owned network, or a mix, the accounting complexity is the same. Consolidated reporting at head office. Site-level P&L that actually helps site managers. Cost allocation done properly. We build the accounting to match how your business actually runs.

Group 02

Established franchisors

You own and operate the franchise system. Consolidated reporting on the network so you can see which sites are working, which aren't, where the brand is leaking. Royalty stream reconciled site-by-site. Marketing fund accounted for as the trust it legally is. Disclosure documents prepared to the level the Franchising Code requires. And your own head-office group's financials run cleanly underneath all of that.

GROUP 03

Considering franchising

You have built a business that works, and you are wondering if it can be replicated. Franchisability assessment before you spend a dollar on the model. What actually franchises well, what does not. Unit economics that would need to hold at franchisee margins after royalties. Legal, financial and operational readiness. An honest read on whether to pursue franchising, corporate-owned expansion, or licensing, from a firm that works with all three.

The structure

Choosing the model before you scale.

Franchising is one option. It isn't the only one. The choice determines everything downstream. Capital requirement, control, speed to scale, unit economics, what happens when a site under-performs. We work through the trade-offs before you commit.

01

Corporate-owned multi-site

You own every site. Full control, higher capital requirement, faster P&L visibility. Best when unit economics are strong and capital is available.

02

Franchising

Franchisees fund and operate each site under your brand and system. Lower capital burden on you, slower rollout, requires unit economics that still work after royalties.

03

Joint venture per site

Shared ownership with local operating partners at each site. Balances your capital exposure with local operator commitment. Adds shareholder complexity per site.

04

Master franchise or area development

One franchisee takes the rights for a region and rolls out multiple sites themselves. Faster expansion into new geographies, less direct control, larger up-front franchise fee.

05

Licensing

Others use your IP and brand without full franchise obligations. Simpler, less control, less recurring revenue.

06

Hybrid

Corporate-owned in metro, franchised in regional, or vice versa. Common in mature systems and often the right long-term answer once you know the unit economics.

The readiness check

Is my business franchisable?

Owners asking whether to franchise are really asking three questions at once. Can this business be replicated? Would the numbers still work at the second site, the tenth, the fiftieth? And is franchising even the right way to grow?

These are financial questions before they are strategic questions. A short list of what we work through before we recommend a structure or build a financial model. Yes to most of these means you're ready to consider franchising. No or unclear means work on the answer first.

  • Do your single-site unit economics leave enough margin for a franchisee to be profitable after royalties?
  • Can the business be operated by someone who is not you?
  • Is the offer clear enough that someone unfamiliar with the industry could sell it?
  • Have you documented the operating system so a franchisee could execute it?
  • Do you have the capital to support the head-office team through the first three to five sites?
  • Have you tested the model on a second site under your own operation before offering to franchisees?
The rules

What the Franchising Code requires.

Franchising in Australia is a regulated activity. The Franchising Code of Conduct sits under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 and applies to any franchise agreement, no matter how small. Getting the compliance foundations right is not optional. The penalties for non-compliance are commercial as well as legal.

Disclosure Document

A formal document you must provide every prospective franchisee at least 14 days before they sign. Covers your business history, financial position, litigation record, franchisee list, marketing fund, and specific financial disclosures. Must be updated annually and prepared in the exact format the Code requires.

Franchise Agreement

The legal contract between franchisor and franchisee. Term, territory, fees, obligations, renewal rights, termination triggers, dispute resolution. The legal drafting is your franchise lawyer's job. Our job is making sure the commercial terms (fees, marketing levy, renewal) actually work in the financial model.

Marketing Fund Trust

If you collect a marketing levy from franchisees, it is legally a trust. Held on trust, spent on marketing, reported to franchisees annually with audited financials. Not a slush fund. We set up the trust accounting properly from day one.

Key Facts Sheet and Cooling Off

A short summary of the franchise offer given to every prospective franchisee. Plus statutory cooling-off periods, franchisee associations, and dispute resolution processes that must be respected. The full Code applies from day one.

The core work

The financial model is where the answer lives.

A franchise system only works when both parties are profitable. The franchisee and the franchisor. Not one or the other. We build a five-year financial model that shows the outcomes for both, so you can see whether the system supports both parties before you commit.

The model runs scenarios. Sales volumes, pricing, expense ratios, fee structures. It gives you a defensible view of what the numbers do at scale. The outcome is either a green light (proceed) or a red light (fix the economics before you franchise). Nothing in between.

A collaborative three-step engagement.

Step 01

Kickoff and assumptions

We meet to learn about your business and document the assumptions that drive the model. Sales drivers, cost ratios, franchise fees, site setup costs, rollout pace.

Step 02

Build and test

We build the five-year model and test it across scenarios with dummy data before we present it back.

Step 03

Present, iterate, lock

We meet again to walk through the model, adjust assumptions, and lock in the final version.

The model: franchisee side.

Sales and revenue

Key drivers of sales, impact of pricing and volume, marketing spend and customer cost of acquisition.

Key expense ratios

Cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue, employment costs, rent, other overheads.

Franchise charges

Royalty (fixed, tiered, or percentage), marketing levy, training fees, other recurring charges.

New site setup cost

Capex and site-ready work, franchise equipment and fit-out, franchise fee, opening working capital.

The model: franchisor side.

Revenue

Royalty income, marketing levy, training fees. Timeline for the rollout of new sites.

Expense ratios

Head-office employment, business development, marketing, operations, other head-office overheads.

Franchisor valuation

A high-level valuation of the franchisor entity at different site counts and different exit multiples.

Outcome

A flexible model you own. Change the fee structure, the rollout pace, the assumptions. See the impact on both sides immediately.

In practice

From two sites to a franchisable system.

Food-and-beverage owner running two sites (a large restaurant and a food court unit) with no production kitchen. Wanted to franchise. Financial model showed strong unit economics per site but weak franchisor economics under the proposed 6% flat royalty. The head-office losses would run into site 12 before turning profitable.

We restructured the fee schedule to a tiered royalty (8% first five sites, 6% thereafter, 4% at 20+ sites) plus a $30k up-front franchise fee. The franchisor turned profitable at site four rather than site twelve. Ready to franchise six months later.

Illustrative composite; specific numbers and details anonymised.

Ready when you are

Ready to see the numbers?

25-minute discovery call. Bring your unit economics and the questions you cannot answer yet.

Book a call